November 2020

The EU, Bioheat & the Future of Flame Detection

The cadmium sulfide cell, or cad cell as it’s more commonly called, has provided more than a half century of yeoman service, but that time may be ending soon for a couple of reasons.

To review, how does the cad cell do its job? The cad cell eye is made from a cadmium-coated disc with a conductive grid encased in a protective enclosure. The cad cell eye has a very high resistance in darkness and a very low resistance in the presence of visible light. It is basically a variable resistor that alters its resistance in relation to the light it sees.

The cad cell’s primary control uses this resistance to determine whether a flame is present or not. The ohm level that is determined to be an unsuiable flame and to cause the primary control to lockout is called the threshold. Resistance is measured in ohms and must only be checked on de-energized circuits. Failure to do so will usually result in the need for a new multimeter!

In darkness, the ohm reading will be well over 50,000 ohms and is typically in the hundreds of thousands ohms. When subjected to a typical oil burner flame, it will drop to under 1,000 ohms and most often in the 200–300 ohm range. Cad cell resistance also varies in relation to CO2 readings; lower CO2 will raise cad cell ohm readings and vice versa. As an example, at 12% CO2, the ohm reading may be 300; at 10% CO2 it could be double that.

The primary control or cad cell relay must have a very high resistance across the F-F terminals to allow the burner to start—this is to prevent burner operation when a flame is already present. After the trial for ignition (TFI) period ends, the cad cell must provide a resistance under the lockout threshold to prove the presence of flame and allow continued burner operation. The lockout threshold varies by manufacturer and is field selectable on some newer primary controls. All microprocessor-based controls have a higher threshold than older electromechanical types, but 1,600 ohms will be sufficient for even older legacy primary controls.

Room for improvement
The electro-mechanical controls are operated on a very reliable, robust system that has proven itself over the years. If it isn’t broken, then why fix it? There are two main reasons—first is the cadmium itself. Cadmium and its compounds are highly toxic and exposure to this metal is known to cause cancer, targeting the body’s cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, neurological, reproductive and respiratory systems. The danger is primarily to process and production workers rather than service technicians, as they do not handle cadmium directly. Riello has already switched to a new flame detector without cadmium in response to a European Union (EU) directive preventing the use of hazardous materials in production processes.

Riello’s new flame sensor














The second reason for alternative flame detection systems is the move to higher biodiesel blends to meet both State mandates and industry goals for carbon output reductions. Unlike heating oil, biodiesel doesn’t contain paraffins—meaning the flame is less luminous and emits less light than No. 2 oil. You can’t visually see the difference, but the cad cell eye sure can! This only becomes a potential issue with very high blends of biodiesel and very low CO2 levels. Keep in mind—as excess air and CO2 go down, cad cell resistance goes up.

There are many sites currently using B100 that are experiencing no problems at all with cad cell flame detection. However, to assure reliability in the face of unknown excess air levels and high blends of biofuel, an alternative to cad cell-based flame detection will probably be needed for the industry to satisfy required greenhouse gas emission targets.

What are the alternatives to cadmium sulfide flame detection technology? In commercial applications over 20GPH input, where cad cell use is not permitted, Ultraviolet (UV) flame sensors are most commonly used. UV sensors are utilized extensively in Europe with residential blue flame burners; the Buderus 125 series boilers that were sold in the U.S. used UV flame detection. The drawbacks are the cost, compared to cad cells, and the lack of backward compatibility with existing primary controls. Infrared (IR) flame detectors have the same negatives as UV.

The photodiode is a promising technology for flame detection and you may have already used a photodiode sensor without knowing it. The new Riello flame sensor introduced over a year ago utilizes photodiode technology—basically a very tiny “solar panel” that produces an electrical current when exposed to light. The Riello primary control takes this current and converts it to a resistance output so it’s backward compatible with all existing Riello controls.

The “conversion” is done electronically via semi-conductors on a small board within the sensor assembly itself. The older Riello cad cell detectors are enclosed in white plastic while the newer photodiode types are in black plastic enclosures, making them easily distinguishable. The photodiode type of flame sensor cannot be tested with an ohmmeter.

As we move forward into a renewable future, it’s a pretty good bet that the cad cell flame sensor will indeed be supplanted by a new and better technology. ICM

See other similar Articles in the Installations Category.